3 comments

  • anilgulecha 26 minutes ago
    You have a good core idea here. You're pretty much killing your project in infancy with the AGPL+donation license model. Meanwhile, some other projects will take the core idea of "language aware differ" and release BSD, and one of those will win, including perhaps making it into git/future version controls.

    IMO, you should seek to make this a standard that wins, and hopefully other opportunities that come will be where you make commercial hay. My unsolicited 2c.

    • FabCH 8 minutes ago
      I really do care about copyleft and AGPL. It’s a political choice. I specifically chose it because I know from direct experience that big tech is allergic to it.

      I actually don’t care about the commercial license. It’s more of an experiment for my own amusement than an actual attempt at building a commercial project.

      If it inspires someone to build another one and we still end up with a better differ, I’m ok with that world. As long as the open source community has a better differ.

      Note that there already are at least 3 that I am aware of. But they do perform worse on speed and accuracy.

  • paaloeye 1 hour ago
    • FabCH 1 hour ago
      Not quite.

      In the meantime, I added support for all other non-code file formats. Hence the name change.

      It’s quite a big chunk of functionality.

  • paaloeye 2 hours ago
    How is it better or worse compared to https://github.com/dandavison/delta ?
    • FabCH 1 hour ago
      It’s much much better with moved code.

      Delta adds color to the standard git diff algorithm.

      Omnidiff uses a completely different algorithm.

      About a third of diffs are significantly better.

      • paaloeye 1 hour ago
        Okay, I'll give it a try then.