5 comments

  • bessbd 1 hour ago
    > 5 phases and 33 stages from initialization through operation

    > 14 agents: 11 domain experts, 2 reviewers, and an adaptive composer

    wow, that's a lot of domain experts, I'm convinced

    • N_Lens 22 minutes ago
      Not unless you look at my framework (Which I've just hacked together after looking at this) - it has 12! domain experts!
    • longwave 1 hour ago
      > The current recommended model is Claude Opus 4.8.

      Staying well behind the frontier, just in case.

    • zamalek 1 hour ago
      It was like that time I nearly dropped out of undergrad, but it was my mistake, I had just forgotten that I was actually a doctorate.
    • robbomacrae 1 hour ago
      It's a great for tokenmaxxing /s
  • ernsheong 48 minutes ago
    I'm not sure that it needs to be this complicated. But yes, I am interested in the problem of hard guardrails between multiple agents, and it is not an easy problem to solve.
  • swiftcoder 2 hours ago
    Sounds good in theory, but are there evaluations of whether or not it actually works?
    • robbomacrae 1 hour ago
      The answer to that is no. A lot of these are released on vibes and showing that it does what it says it does. For most organizations that care about processes and procedures thats... enough? I've worked on agentic development in enterprise and they just want their way to stamp their old methods on to the new agentic world so it can pass through their release hoops.

      I've tried to benchmark them the most common public skills including those for ADLC (ie SuperPowers) couple of times here https://orcabot.com/benchmarks/agent-skills. Annoyingly I haven't been able to release one in a while because its been next to impossible to stop the new frontier models from cheating one way or another.

    • jiaosdjf 1 hour ago
      Probably the greatest problem in AI right now is proof / benchmarking

      I check every benchmark site weekly, compare harnesses and models, and its still pretty much just vibes

    • CharlieDigital 1 hour ago
      My org has something similar.

      Evals showed that speed and token use improved when it was removed.....

      The models have improved and internalized some of these principles.

      They still have value, IMO, because they help improve consistency (at the expense of speed and cost).

    • Throw12349067 1 hour ago
      I am one of the organisational victims who have been trialling this.

      My assessment has been just use the native harness.

  • imtringued 32 minutes ago
    Well, if it was any good we know for sure that they didn't use it to generate their README.MD with it.
  • redhale 8 minutes ago
    [dead]