Y Combinator's Ankit Gupta faces backlash over H-1B comments

(americanbazaaronline.com)

29 points | by Tabular-Iceberg 1 hour ago

7 comments

  • xvxvx 47 minutes ago
    It was clearly a minor joke but I don’t think people realize how close to the fire the immigration debate is. There are sections of X making plans for seizing the property and belongings of deported H1B visa holders. It’s extreme but not impossible.
  • ActionHank 57 minutes ago
    Why not spin up the startups in those other countries then?

    Heck, why not spin up YC Foundries elsewhere in the world?

    No H1B needed.

    • blhack 25 minutes ago
      YC has. There has been (if I remember correctly) batches entirely based on India.
      • ActionHank 10 minutes ago
        No, you misunderstand, I am not saying run a batch there. I am saying that YC should startup an org there that purely contracts to their startups, no need to hire, no need for H1Bs.
    • phoronixrly 50 minutes ago
      Because US VCs seem to have an allergic reaction to EU regulation?

      Was that a rhetorical question or do you miss the regularly scheduled front page posts complaining that the EU kills innovation?

      • ActionHank 47 minutes ago
        Gotta be honest, I very strongly doubt that most H1Bs go to people out of the EU.
  • samrus 1 hour ago
    trolling very close to the sun
  • tkel 55 minutes ago
    Capitalist right-wing vs nativist right-wing
  • decremental 1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • zerr 1 hour ago
    How is discrimination by citizenship more acceptable than e.g. discrimination by ethnicity or race? All of these are outcomes of birth lottery.
    • estearum 58 minutes ago
      Not taking a position on either side of the underlying debate, but obviously a government has a unique obligation to its own citizens, and ideally no unique obligation to an ethnicity or race.
    • ckrapu 58 minutes ago
      A country's first responsibility should be to its citizens.
    • ActionHank 54 minutes ago
      What obligation does the government have to those who are not their citizens? 100% a lottery, but your logic here is willful ignorance.
      • zerr 50 minutes ago
        The point is to have a system that does not discriminate based on lottery.
        • ckrapu 38 minutes ago
          Well, an American farmer cannot sell his grain in India. That also seems to be discrimination simply because he is in the wrong place. Are you arguing that all protectionism is flawed and wrong?
          • __d 25 minutes ago
            Until very recently, that was a pretty common view. Countries generally want unconstrained exports, while limiting competitive imports.
            • ckrapu 12 minutes ago
              That might be true in practice but also 1) completely incompatible with global notions of fairness and justice, and 2) not an especially compelling political argument for getting countries to open up their markets.