Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux

(codeberg.org)

50 points | by ibobev 3 days ago

7 comments

  • rahen 43 minutes ago
  • someperson 49 minutes ago
    I'm heartened that recent Linux kernels in 2026 can still target i386 systems!

    Between i486, i586 and i686 there's been a steady drumbeat of Linux distros and kernel itself deprecating support

    • setopt 32 minutes ago
      I’m curious, are you running i386 devices or more philosophically opposed to deprecation?
    • drzaiusx11 30 minutes ago
      Didn't mainline Linux drop i386 in like 2012? Wild it still functions tbh
  • jll29 1 hour ago
    Could the be a good "mom and pop" OS to reduce (remote) IT maintenance workload for geeks from parent "clients"?
    • qsort 25 minutes ago
      > Could the be a good "mom and pop" OS

      Hate to be that guy, but if that's your problem just hand them an iPad or a Chromebook. Unsatisfying, I know, but it's not like my mom is Mrs. Roberts.

      A WSL-like for Win9x is mostly just for the lulz.

    • Arainach 1 hour ago
      No.

      No one should be running Win9x for anything connected to the internet. Ever, full stop.

      The only reason to touch it is for a dedicated retro gaming setup or (completely airgapped) for some industrial tool with drivers/software provided by a company that has been defunct for 25+ years.

      • setopt 30 minutes ago
        Are there even still sufficiently large populations of win9x-compatible viruses online to make it a security issue anymore?
  • nilslindemann 1 hour ago
    Can it run a Linux subsystem?
  • johnea 22 minutes ago
    Windows fans, like being a Mustang or Corvette fan, represent arrested development in last centuries technology...
    • isityettime 6 minutes ago
      Windows as a product feels that way, but I think if you're a kernel hacker, that's not really true for you. Monolithic kernels for Unix-like operating systems like GNU/Linux aren't fundamentally that innovative either. (There's innovation within Linux, of course.)

      I also don't really think computing advances in such a linear way. Lots of cool new tech is about digging up underappreciated insights from computing's distant past and applying it in a new context, or even just propagating it more widely.

      I'm not saying Windows 9x in particular had anything super interesting going on. But all of the viable desktop and server operating systems are based on really old tech, and at the same time computing's distant past is full of hidden treasures.

  • tosti 1 hour ago
    • mtlynch 1 hour ago
      These are all different submitters. HN is supposed to detect duplicate links.
      • tosti 1 hour ago
        Allrightie then ./
  • gitowiec 1 hour ago
    And writing "Proudly written without AI." in README.md now is new black?
    • jessetemp 56 minutes ago
      It’s a craft like anything else. Some people enjoy building a table and feel a sense of accomplishment telling their friends “I built this.” Other people just want a table and buy one from Ikea
    • sph 55 minutes ago
      It's like those labels of protected origin they put on high-quality artisan foods from the EU.
    • dataflow 1 hour ago
      My question is, if they did decide to use AI someday, would they remember to update README.md in the same commit? I would probably forget.
      • drxzcl 53 minutes ago
        The agent will happily fix that for them. They are through like that.