9 comments

  • jannniii 15 minutes ago
    Nice idea, but the labels are a bit too opinionated for me.

    Literally all my code has been ”ghostwritten” for the past 18 months. Does not sound like something enterprise customers would like to hear and try to understand what it means.

  • wewewedxfgdf 55 minutes ago
    We should assume projects have AI/LLM development assistance unless stated otherwise.

    You may have noticed the absolutely vast array of AI development tools and assistants and IDEs and integrations - this is a reasonable indicator that developers are actually doing AI/LLM development.

  • crimsonnoodle58 1 hour ago
    I would think the term 'vibe coded', 'vibed', '100% vibes', etc would be far more appropriate and well known, than 'lorem ipsum' when it comes to generating code without reviewing the output.

    If I saw that badge on someones github I would think it had something to do with lorem ipsum text generation, rather than anything to do with AI.

  • varun_ch 2 hours ago
    A little ironic that the README, SPEC.md and the poster's comment here all smell of LLM writing!
    • jofzar 55 minutes ago
      They put a 3/5 for themselves, atleast they are honest.
  • hedora 3 hours ago
    (1) Why?

    (2) The code I write with AI doesn’t fit on the scale.

    • charcircuit 1 hour ago
      Considering the more AI you use the more red it is along with demeaning language for the scales I assume it is mainly for anti-AI people to virtue signal about not using it.
      • retsibsi 5 minutes ago
        It looks a bit like that, but they gave their own repo a 3/5 rating and it's full of obvious LLMisms, so I think they're not totally anti-AI and are trying to be evenhanded.

        To me, the metaphor doesn't really work, especially at level 5. Lorum Ipsum is literal placeholder text which is basically the same everywhere it's used; I don't see what that has to do with vibe code. (Also the verse/prose thing seems pretty wanky to me, but I admit that's just a matter of taste.)

  • peteforde 3 hours ago
    Given the reality that there are a lot of people who [fairly or unfairly] judge anything that uses "AI" in a decisively negative way, what possible advantage is there in giving people a reason to dismiss your project without evaluating it on its own merits?
    • jimbooonooo 2 hours ago
      Is honesty an important quality to you? Does lying by omission concern you for the people and projects you choose to interact with?
      • the_biot 2 minutes ago
        Honesty is the whole problem with ideas like this. If you're the kind of deluded idiot that considers LLM-generated crap "your code", stating exactly how little you had to do with it is not in your advantage. Far easier to maintain the lie.
      • 9864247888754 1 hour ago
        Nobody owes you any transparency about the way they develop their software.
        • jimbooonooo 1 hour ago
          They sure don't, but often insight into/alignment with the story and development process makes all the difference for which projects people choose to contribute to.
  • easygenes 1 hour ago
    This is very similar to a project I created https://github.com/Entrpi/autonomy-golf and have been using as a gamified development process on active projects.

    The key insight was to not just handwave or guess at how much is automated, but make evaluation and review part of the continuous development loop. I first implemented in https://github.com/Entrpi/autoresearch-everywhere where I used it to deliberately automate more, in the spirit of Karpathy's upstream (and to very good effect. I have some of the best autoresearch results anywhere, and the platform is far more robust than it started).

  • qainsights 5 hours ago
    AIx is an open standard for disclosing AI involvement in software projects - expressed through the language of authorship. Not a judgment. Just transparency.
    • rvz 4 hours ago
      Just one tiny issue:

      "AIX®" is also a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and used for the AIX® operating system that is still in use today.

      I would be careful to use that name.

  • pbronez 3 hours ago
    Neat idea. I like the five point scale